🔗 Share this article

Iran is ready to resume nuclear discussions with Washington on condition that it is treated with "respect" and "respect", Iran's foreign minister has declared.

Abbas Araghchi stated only diplomacy was effective, and disclosed fresh requests had been made by go-betweens to reopen discussions with the American leadership. He said Iran possessed no undeclared nuclear sites, and Iran could not yet authorize the International Atomic Energy Agency to inspect attacked atomic facilities for safety concerns.

Navigating a Complex Path

Araghchi is navigating a challenging path since Iran does not want be seen to be acting from a position of vulnerability, and he consistently maintained that Iran had come out stronger in military terms and emotionally from the Israeli-US attack on its enrichment centers in June.

He was addressing at a defense forum in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an absolute privilege to refine atomic fuel within its borders that it will always maintain" – the main reason of the impasse in the previous talks.

Earlier Discussions Abruptly Concluded

The previous five rounds of negotiations between the United States and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and hostile end on 12 June when the Israeli government, with US support, attacked Tehran's atomic facilities in a fortnight-long engagement that concluded with the American leader asserting the locations had been obliterated. Afterward, European countries employed their privilege to reimpose global restrictions, but Iran asserts they have not had a significant effect.

Magic Solution Suggested

Tehran representatives said they felt they had attained a "perfect agreement" to the uranium processing matter in earlier negotiations, when it was agreed an Iran-based consortium with Washington's engagement could process nuclear material. The two nations would have been able to assert triumph since domestic enrichment would have persisted and the US could be confident that Iran's nuclear programme was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been settled in the talks that US nuclear scientists could function inside Iran, but that was a reasonable assumption of the cooperative offer. Diplomats stated repeatedly they had achieved a deal with Washington's diplomat the American negotiator only for the arrangement to collapse due to "spoilers in Washington".

Current Position

Iran's diplomats declared the partnership proposal was now withdrawn, but it seems very probable the proposal could be reintroduced in various formats if talks reopen.

The American leader in recent days stated he had been obtaining communications that Iran desired to resume discussions, but privately Tehran representatives state they are not yet obtaining coherent offers from Washington either directly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Iran's state department has been criticized of non-responsiveness in the face of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran states dialogue is not part of a spectacle.

Political Stance

In his speech to the gathering, designed to portray the US as a hegemonic power that abuses the notion of global regulations, the foreign minister stated the fortnight-long engagement revealed the conflict could not be settled by combat operations. He stated the assaults commenced with a American requirement for an total Iran submission and concluded with an absolute demand for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is convinced the initial Israeli attacks were carried out with full US knowledge and coordination, making confidence hard to reestablish.

Negotiations Stays the Primary Resolution

The foreign minister said: "It was not Iran that had deserted diplomacy; it was America and the European states that had consistently sought to impose their desires during the talks. Negotiations can still be active and stays the ultimate answer to address conflicts, but its standards, regulations and fundamentals must be followed."

"If they talk to the citizens of Tehran with the tone of dignity and respect, they will obtain a answer in the same approach."

Restoration and Reconstruction

In what is portrayed by Iran's diplomats as the conflict of restoration and recovery, the foreign minister claimed he was certain Iran's military capacities "are considerably enhanced than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been reestablished. We acquired many lessons from this conflict; we have come to know our own weaknesses and the shortcomings of the enemy."

He stated: "We effectively endured this conflict. Our enrichment knowledge, which they intended to obliterate, stays intact. The installations and equipment, if destroyed, will be rebuilt; what is crucial is the will of the nation of Iran and then the unity of the country that they sought to undermine, but did not succeed to destroy. The citizens of Tehran have become more powerful, more integrated, and more supportive of the government and the nation in the face of this attack."